Skip to main content
· 6/19/1991

Highlands Insurance Co. v. New England Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 811 S.W.2d 272
  • 1991 Tex. App. LEXIS 1785
  • 1991 WL 129719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting contention that “broad as primary” provision modified the excess insurance policy’s subrogation provisions
  • rejecting contention that “broad as primary” provision modified the excess insurance policy’s subrogation provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reeves, Peeples, Biery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.