· 6/19/1991
Highlands Insurance Co. v. New England Insurance Co.
Citations
- 811 S.W.2d 272
- 1991 Tex. App. LEXIS 1785
- 1991 WL 129719
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting contention that “broad as primary” provision modified the excess insurance policy’s subrogation provisions
- rejecting contention that “broad as primary” provision modified the excess insurance policy’s subrogation provisions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reeves, Peeples, Biery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.