HIGHLANDS INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no abuse of discretion for prejudgment interest to begin running on the insurer’s date of payment rather than the date of its complaint for reimbursement
• “Both parties agree that Continental’s policy on the truck is primary 15 under the statute because it describes the truck as an owned automobile by reference to the 16 Vehicle Identification Number.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).