High v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Telling a suspect that “judges love to hear that defendants helped the police” does not constitute a “hope of benefit.”
• “USCR 31.3 clearly grants the trial court the discretion as to the reception of evidence. There is no per se right to an evidentiary hearing, only to a hearing, nor any mandatory obligation to produce testimonial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Boone v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-09-23· cited 12×
• Estrada v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-02-14· cited 9×
• Hayles v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-09-19· cited 8×
• Givens v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-08-30· cited 5×
• Gonzalez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-03-01· cited 5×
• Canty v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-05-07· cited 2×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-07-02· cited 2×
• Rodolfo Estrada v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-02-14
• Gregory Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-07-02

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Leigh v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-12-03· cited 29×
• Willett v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-12-05· cited 21×
• Stephens v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-11-05· cited 20×
• Jordan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-02-12· cited 14×
• Colkitt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-10-05· cited 9×
• Talmadge v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-02-12· cited 9×
• Griffin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-08-23· cited 7×