High v. Jasper Manufacturing Co.
Citations
- 57 Fla. 437
Syllabus
<p>1. Upon an application to dissolve a temporary injunction upon bill, answe'r and affidavits by the respective parties the chancellor must be governed by the weight of the evidence, and unless it clearly appears that the ruling upon such application is against the weight of the evidence, it will not be reversed on appeal. (44. Fla. 491; 45 Fla. 551.)</p> <p>2. A sale of timber standing on land is a contract concerning an interest in land within the meaning of the statute of frauds, and while a parol sale of standing timber may operate as a license to enter and cut trees, it is revoked by a sale ‘and conveyance of the land to a third person.</p> <p>3. Where a tract of land is the constitutional homestead of a head of a family residing in this State, and the owner is a married man, a deed executed by him alone does not convey any right, title or interest in the homestead real estate, and where upon application to dissolve a temporary injunction upon bill, answer and affidavit it appears that the deed was executed by the husband alone, and the answer alleges that the land described therein was at the time of the execution of such deed a homestead, and where the lands described are so located as to show they may have been part of a homestead of 160 acres, and the allegation is denied in a single affidavit on the part of the complainant, the ruling of the Circuit Judge dissolving the temporary injunction will not be disturbed on appeal.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where a married man is the title owner of homestead property, his wife must join in the conveyance in order to alienate the homestead real estate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Account, Hocker, Illness, Parkhill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pasco v. HarleySupreme Court of Florida· 1917-04-03· cited 62×
- Shad v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-11-15· cited 33×
- Norton v. BayaSupreme Court of Florida· 1924-04-11· cited 27×
- Taylor v. ManessDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-15· cited 24×
- Elsberry v. SextonSupreme Court of Florida· 1911-01-15· cited 21×
- Devlin v. the Phoenix, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-05-23· cited 12×
- Prescott v. J. S. Betts Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1921-04-15· cited 5×
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Department of RevenueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-02-09
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McClusky v. TrusselMississippi Supreme Court· 1907-03-15· cited 36×
- Richbourg v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 35×
- Thomas v. CraftSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 29×
- Tampa & Jacksonville Railway Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-04-20· cited 29×
- Jenkins v. LykesSupreme Court of Florida· 1882-06-15· cited 23×
- Baya v. Town of Lake CitySupreme Court of Florida· 1902-06-15· cited 9×
- Richardson v. KittlewellSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.