Skip to main content
· 1/14/1926

High Shoals Co. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 3 B.T.A. 305
  • 1926 BTA LEXIS 2697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he legislature carved out an exception to the common law ‘public purpose’ invitee doctrine by exempting a particular ‘public purpose’—outdoor recreation.”
  • lack of recreational funds used for the project is evidence of nonrecreational purpose
  • maintenance of trail as part of city’s park system suggestive of recreational purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trammell, James, Smith, Phillips, Littleton, Teussell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.