· 1/14/1926
High Shoals Co. v. Commissioner
Citations
- 3 B.T.A. 305
- 1926 BTA LEXIS 2697
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he legislature carved out an exception to the common law ‘public purpose’ invitee doctrine by exempting a particular ‘public purpose’—outdoor recreation.”
- lack of recreational funds used for the project is evidence of nonrecreational purpose
- maintenance of trail as part of city’s park system suggestive of recreational purpose
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Trammell, James, Smith, Phillips, Littleton, Teussell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.