High Plains Cattle Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Dean does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review
• finding that petitioner failed to show “that Dean announced a new rule of constitutional law that was made retroactive to cases on collateral review”
• holding Dean has not been recognized as applying retroactively to cases on collateral review
• finding the defendant failed to show that Dean announced a new rule of constitutional law made retroactive on collateral review
• denying petitioner’s motion for authorization to file a successive § 2255 because the Supreme Court has not made Dean retroactive to cases on collateral review
• denying certification because the defendant had not “made a prima facie showing that Dean announced a new rule of constitutional law that was made retroactive to cases on collateral review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).