High Bull

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a class action procedure cannot “in any way alter the substantive proof required to prove up a claim for relief’
• stating that class treatment in no way alters substantive proof required to succeed on claim for relief
• stating that class treatment in no way alters substantive proof required to succeed on claim for relief
• noting the overlap between proof of injury for liability purposes and for damage calculation purposes under Clayton section 4
• noting the overlap between proof of injury for liability purposes and for damage calculation purposes under Clayton section 4
• noting that in price fixing ease wherein a homogenous product was marketed in a similar manner nationwide, “once the illegal overcharge ... has been established, it is most reasonable to assume ‘injury’ or ‘impact’ upon a showing of proof of purchase”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).