Higgins v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, after Oncale, the issue of whether same-sex harassment based on gender stereotyping is actionable is “no longer open”
• holding that, on summary judgment, “[t]he district court is free to disregard arguments that are not adequately developed”
• holding that the relevant issue in a failure to accommodate claim is whether the defendant implemented the reasonable accommodation, not the defendant’s intent
• holding that, on summary judgment, “[t]he district court is free to disregard arguments that are not adequately developed”
• holding that, on summary judgment, “[t]he district court is free to disregard arguments that are not adequately developed”
• holding that, after Oncale, the issue of whether same-sex harassment based on gender stereotyping is actionable is “no longer open”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).