Skip to main content
· 4/1/1929

Higgins v. Central Cigar Co.

Citations

  • 32 F.2d 400
  • 59 App. D.C. 9
  • 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3774

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “whether the police physically restrict the suspect’s liberty is an important factor in analyzing” whether an arrest occurred
  • observing that “handcuffing substantially aggravates the intrusiveness of an otherwise routine investigatory detention and is not part of a typical Teny stop”
  • stating that, among other factors, “handcuffing substantially aggravates the intrusiveness of an otherwise routine investigatory detention and is not part of a typical Terry stop.”
  • suggesting that the same police actions can constitute a de facto arrest in some circumstances but not in others
  • explaining that “as a practical matter neither society nor our enforcement of the laws is yet color-blind”
  • noting that when an officer is alone or out-numbered, more aggressive tactics may be justified

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.