Skip to main content
· 3/17/1961

Higgins v. Cardinal Manufacturing Co.

Citations

  • 360 P.2d 456
  • 188 Kan. 11
  • 1961 Kan. LEXIS 241
  • 47 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that deduction of sum equal to union dues violates state constitutional amendment prohibiting employer from conditioning employment on union membership
  • holding that deduction of sum equal to union dues violates state constitutional amendment prohibiting employer from conditioning employment on union membership
  • it is \highly speculative\ to conclude legislature's failure to pass a bill on the subject at hand to be indicative of legislative intent; legislature may have considered the legislation unnecessary in light of current state law
  • it is “highly speculative” to conclude legislature’s failure to pass a bill on the subject at hand to be in dicative of legislative intent; legislature may have considered the legislation unnecessary in light of current state law
  • it is \highly speculative\ to conclude Legislature's failure to pass a bill on the subject at hand points to legislative intent; Legislature may have considered the legislation unnecessary because of current state law
  • it is 'highly speculative' to conclude legislature's failure to pass a bill on the subject at hand to be indicative of legislative intent; legislature may have considered the legislation unnecessary in light of current state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.