· 11/3/1924
Higgins v. California Prune & Apricot Grower, Inc.
Citations
- 3 F.2d 896
- 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2493
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- district court “rightly” declined to consider effect of subsequent Supreme Court decision upon mandate of court of appeals
- forerunner of Section 2283 considered
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Manton, Hand
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.