Skip to main content
· 11/3/1924

Higgins v. California Prune & Apricot Grower, Inc.

Citations

  • 3 F.2d 896
  • 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • district court “rightly” declined to consider effect of subsequent Supreme Court decision upon mandate of court of appeals
  • forerunner of Section 2283 considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Manton, Hand

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.