Higginbottom v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that reliance “is not justified when knowledge to the contrary exists.”
• stating elements of promissory estoppel in different context
• “It has long been the rule in 12 Arizona that a valid statute is automatically part of any contract affected by it, even if the 13 statute is not specifically mentioned in the contract. . . . Thus, where a contract is 14 incompatible with a statute, the statute governs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).