Higgason v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Keene v. Elkhart County Park and Recreation Bd., 740 N.E.2d 898, 896 (Ind.Ct.App.2000), reh'g denied
• “[W]illful or wanton behavior does not necessarily remove one from the scope of his employment.”
• “Because the trial court did not have to wait for a response from Higgason, the trial court did not err when it ruled on Defendants’ motion thirteen days after it was filed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).