Hielkema v. Forrest Constr., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that court must raise Rooker - Feldman on its own initiative because it affects court's subject matter jurisdiction
• observing that administrative proceedings are “ongoing” for Younger abstention purposes until state judicial review is completed (citing New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc. v. Council of the City of New Orleans, 491 U.S. 350, 374 (1989) (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring))
• relying on Younger to abstain from licensing proceeding before state horse racing board

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).