· 9/21/1964
Hiebert v. United States
Citations
- 235 F. Supp. 466
- 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8007
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Court is reluctant to reward BMW for its inability or unwillingness to produce responsive information to Oscar’s discovery requests.”
- “Plaintiff may seek leave to renew in the event that he can make a fuller showing that he meets the numerosity requirement of Rule 23(a).”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Plummer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.