· 4/18/1929
Hidden v. Durey
Citations
- 34 F.2d 174
- 7 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 9286
- 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1418
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the accuracy of plaintiffs’ alleged misrepresentations by defendant was irrelevant, and dismissal was appropriate, because plaintiffs failed to allege the requisite scienter
- generalized motive to justify investment and have it appear profitable, “one which could be imputed to any publicly-owned, for-profit endeavor, is not sufficiently concrete for purposes of inferring scienter”
- “Fraud cannot be inferred simply because GE might have been more curious or concerned about the activity at Kidder.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cooper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.