Hicks v. Williamsport
Citations
- 235 Pa. 509
- 84 A. 435
- 1912 Pa. LEXIS 577
Syllabus
<p>Hoad law — Change of grade — Physical change — Authority of councils.</p> <p>Damages are not recoverable for a change of grade of a street until the actual work on the ground is begun. It is the physical change and not the mere establishment of the grade on the official plan that gives the right, and such grading must be done only by the authority of the city councils exercised in the manner prescribed by law. Work done by a street commissioner without authority of a city ordinance does not constitute a legal change of grade which will confer upon the owner of abutting property a right for damages.</p>
Judges: Brown, Cueiam, Elkin, Fell, Potter, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hirsch v. North Braddock BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1916-01-03· cited 4×
- Frick v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1915-07-21· cited 4×
- Lawrence McFadden Co. v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1915-02-24· cited 2×
- In re Change of Grade Borough of DorrancetonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-02-28
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.