· 10/7/2013
Hicks v. Stephens
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 388
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 57
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3180
- 571 U.S. 835
- 2013 WL 5507596
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing motions to reopen as administrative mechanism for noncitizens to “provide new information relevant to their cases to the immigration authorities” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
- “A motion to reopen is a traditional procedural mechanism . . . to give aliens a means to provide new information relevant to their cases to the immigration authorities.” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.