Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

Hicks v. Stephens

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 388
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 57
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3180
  • 571 U.S. 835
  • 2013 WL 5507596
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing motions to reopen as administrative mechanism for noncitizens to “provide new information relevant to their cases to the immigration authorities” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “A motion to reopen is a traditional procedural mechanism . . . to give aliens a means to provide new information relevant to their cases to the immigration authorities.” (citation and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.