· 8/4/2017
Hicks v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 7095
- 95 N.E.3d 852
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in concluding that Appellant was collaterally estopped from obtaining coverage under Appellee's insurance policy. Facts pertaining to the scope of permission were determined in the underlying tort proceeding, to which Appellant was a party, and those facts precluded Appellant's claim of coverage under Appellee's policy. Affirmed. (Froelich, J., dissenting.)
Judges: Welbaum, Froelich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.