Skip to main content
· 8/4/2017

Hicks v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 7095
  • 95 N.E.3d 852

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in concluding that Appellant was collaterally estopped from obtaining coverage under Appellee's insurance policy. Facts pertaining to the scope of permission were determined in the underlying tort proceeding, to which Appellant was a party, and those facts precluded Appellant's claim of coverage under Appellee's policy. Affirmed. (Froelich, J., dissenting.)

Judges: Welbaum, Froelich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.