Hicks v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant's ignorance of the victim's age was not a viable defense to defendant charged with use of a child in a sexual performance in violation of § 827.071(2), Fla. Stat.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Outmezguine v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-03· cited 49×
• McMahon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-24· cited 9×
• Hodge v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-10· cited 8×
• Bullington v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-16· cited 7×
• Grady v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-24· cited 7×
• Nicholson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-05· cited 3×
• Denhart v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-15

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Sorakrai
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-26· cited 22×
• McMahon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-24· cited 9×