Hicks v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that petitioner’s appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise these issues on appeal and preserve them by filing a rule 3.800(b) motion”
• holding \that petitioner's appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise these issues on appeal and preserve them by filing a rule 3.800(b) motion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bernal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-07· cited 3×
• Earnest Carl Daugthrey v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-12-06

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lawson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-10-25· cited 74×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-06-04· cited 47×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-18· cited 11×
• Kirkland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-16· cited 8×
• Flowers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-28· cited 5×
• Music v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-06· cited 3×