Skip to main content
· 10/20/2009

Hicks v. Pilgrim Poultry, G.P.

Citations

  • 299 S.W.3d 249
  • 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 8095
  • 2009 WL 3348582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Courts have consistently held that in the event there is an unambiguous contract and there is no dispute as to the facts that may constitute a breach, it is error to submit the case to the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morriss, Carter, Moseley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.