Hicks v. Mauldin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• osteopathic pediatrician competent where he testified there was absolutely no difference in the way an allopathic physician and an osteopathic pediatrician would treat the condition
• osteopathic pediatrician was competent to testify as an expert in a medical malpractice trial against an allopathic general practitioner when there was testimony that there was no difference in the way the two would have treated the patient
• osteopathic pediatrician testified against allopathic general practitioner
• osteopathic pediatrician testified against allopathic general practitioner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).