Hicks v. Kubit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the appellant had not waived her claims on appeal where she failed to file a brief with the trial court in support of her exceptions, because the appellant raised the claims in her exceptions and Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) concise statement
• finding that wife was responsible for 40% of marital debt and the balance of student loan debt obtained during marriage because she was the beneficiary of the education
• stating that the scope of review in assessing the propriety of an award of alimony is to determine whether the trial court’s order is motivated by prejudice, bias or ill-will, or whether the court has overridden or misapplied the law
• stating that the scope of review in assessing the propriety of an award of alimony is to determine whether the trial court’s order is motivated by prejudice, bias or ill-will, or whether the court has overridden or misapplied the law
• debt characterization as “marital” is not necessarily determinative of which party is liable for its satisfaction
• burden falls on party seeking alimony to prove entitlement to support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).