Hicks v. Hardin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “unfair methods of competition that only threaten to have a transitory impact on the marketplace” do not violate the antitrust laws
• “[A] 41% market share typically indicates that a firm has substantial economic power in the market, and, therefore, has the tools at its disposal to elevate its market share to monopolistic levels.”
• “[T]he Supreme Court, in a now oft quoted phrase, has stated ‘the antitrust laws . . . were enacted for the protection of competition not competitors.’” (omission in original) (quoting Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, 429 U.S. at 488) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).