Skip to main content
· 12/20/2013

Hicks v. Executive Office for the United States Attorneys

Citations

  • 12 F. Supp. 3d 25
  • 2013 WL 6697935
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178616

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting claim that agency was required to compute and produce numbers not present in retained documents because “the Court cannot compel defendant to compile information to address what are essentially questions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Ellen S. Huvelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.