Hicks, Lytle & Co. v. McGehee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the mere fact ... that the attorney for a party has possession of a document does not make his possession of the document the possession of the party”
• \It is quite true that if an attorney for a party comes into possession of a document as attorney for that party his possession of the document is the possession of the party.\ (emphasis in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).