Hicks-Bey v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court had inherent authority to permit a child sex abuse victim to testify via closed circuit television
• \[E]ven improperly admitted evidence may be considered in evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence.\ (citing Lockhart v. Nelson, 488 U.S. 33, 40-42, 109 S.Ct. 285, 102 L.Ed.2d 265 (1988)). [26] See generally D.C.Code § 22-2103 (2009
• “[T]he trial court has inherent authority, unless otherwise specifically precluded, to control the conduct of the proceedings before it, in order to ensure . . . that all parties are treated fairly, and that justice is done.”
• Sullivan, concurring in part and dissenting in part

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-02-01· cited 42×
• Grayson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-11-19· cited 35×
• In Re Jam. J.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-06-05· cited 23×
• Mitchell v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-12-31· cited 19×
• Scales v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-12-23· cited 18×
• Williams v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-09-16· cited 12×
• Best v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-05-30· cited 10×
• Ahmed v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-04-22· cited 8×
• In re J.F.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-01-28· cited 7×
• In re K.S.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-03-05· cited 3×
• In Re KS
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-03-05
• In Re Jf
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-01-28
• Bilal v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-10-15
• RFB Prop., LLC v. Federal National Mortgage Association
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-10-27
• Peter Capote v. State of Alabama
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2023-05-05

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Chapman v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
• Delaware v. Van Arsdall
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
• Maryland v. Craig
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
• Kentucky v. Stincer
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 1,461×
• Coy v. Iowa
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 1,295×
• Lockhart v. Nelson
  Supreme Court· 1988-11-14· cited 1,183×
• M. A. P. v. Ryan
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-12-29· cited 973×
• Johnson v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-01-31· cited 771×
• Irick v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-10-05· cited 211×
• Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.
  Supreme Court· 1931-05-18· cited 205×
• Gonzales v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-09-18· cited 138×
• Monroe v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-07-18· cited 120×
• Nelson v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-12-30· cited 98×
• Reynolds v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1974-11-22· cited 71×
• United States v. Robert C. Lewis, United States of America v. Tommy M. Motlagh, United States of America v. James Boardley
  D.C. Circuit· 1983-11-28· cited 57×
• MacK v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-02-23· cited 56×
• In re W. E. P.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1974-04-23· cited 46×
• Jones v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-05-13· cited 45×
• Hochheiser v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-11-09· cited 39×
• Lewis v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-12-09· cited 38×

Other cases named Hicks-Bey v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Hicks-Bey v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1995-10-02