Hicks-Bey v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court had inherent authority to permit a child sex abuse victim to testify via closed circuit television
• \[E]ven improperly admitted evidence may be considered in evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence.\ (citing Lockhart v. Nelson, 488 U.S. 33, 40-42, 109 S.Ct. 285, 102 L.Ed.2d 265 (1988)). [26] See generally D.C.Code § 22-2103 (2009
• “[T]he trial court has inherent authority, unless otherwise specifically precluded, to control the conduct of the proceedings before it, in order to ensure . . . that all parties are treated fairly, and that justice is done.”
• Sullivan, concurring in part and dissenting in part

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Hicks-Bey v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Hicks-Bey v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1995-10-02