· 3/16/1990
Hickox v. Bell
Citations
- 552 N.E.2d 1133
- 195 Ill. App. 3d 976
- 142 Ill. Dec. 392
- 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a failure to deliver notice is not a material breach
- finding no ambiguity in express language of agreement, despite fact that parties do not agree on meaning of terms of contract
- finding no ambiguity in express language of agreement, despite fact that parties do not agree on meaning of terms of contract
- “a liquidated damages clause will be given effect if it is difficult to determine the actual damages which would result in event of breach”
- while court may have erred in admitting extrinsic evidence while interpreting unambiguous contract, this error was harmless based on review of record
- since a determination of actual damages in the event of a breach would not be difficult, liquidated damages clause held unenforceable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chapman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.