Skip to main content
· 3/16/1990

Hickox v. Bell

Citations

  • 552 N.E.2d 1133
  • 195 Ill. App. 3d 976
  • 142 Ill. Dec. 392
  • 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a failure to deliver notice is not a material breach
  • finding no ambiguity in express language of agreement, despite fact that parties do not agree on meaning of terms of contract
  • finding no ambiguity in express language of agreement, despite fact that parties do not agree on meaning of terms of contract
  • “a liquidated damages clause will be given effect if it is difficult to determine the actual damages which would result in event of breach”
  • while court may have erred in admitting extrinsic evidence while interpreting unambiguous contract, this error was harmless based on review of record
  • since a determination of actual damages in the event of a breach would not be difficult, liquidated damages clause held unenforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chapman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.