Louisiana Court of Appeal· 10/13/1969
Hickman v. Hickman
Citations
- 227 So. 2d 14
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- father's award of temporary custody pending suit for separation-divorce fell when spouses reconciled during pendency of proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tate, Savoy, Hood, Culpepper and Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fountain v. FountainLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1978-12-20· cited 15×
- Mertens v. MertensLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1975-06-06· cited 10×
- Dooley v. DooleyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1983-11-09· cited 6×
- Jordan v. JordanLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1981-01-26· cited 5×
- Smith v. MartinLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1972-11-18· cited 1×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Goetz v. GoetzSupreme Court of Kansas· 1957-01-12· cited 27×
- North v. Ringling Ringling v. NorthSupreme Court of Florida· 1940-08-02· cited 18×
- Hickman v. HickmanLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1969-04-03· cited 15×
- J. v. K.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1967-09-21· cited 12×
- Cote v. CoteCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1966-04-27· cited 9×
- Fletcher v. FletcherNebraska Supreme Court· 1968-01-26· cited 8×
- Huffine v. HuffineVan Wert County Court of Common Pleas· 1947-04-30· cited 6×
- Kinek v. KinekMichigan Supreme Court· 1951-09-05· cited 5×
- Chresst v. ChresstIdaho Supreme Court· 1956-03-28· cited 3×
- Daniels v. DanielsSupreme Court of Delaware· 1953-10-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.