Skip to main content
· 6/30/2008

Hickman v. Branson Ear, Nose & Throat, Inc.

Citations

  • 256 S.W.3d 120
  • 2008 Mo. LEXIS 61
  • 2008 WL 2583001

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting salutary statutory, change eliminating requirement that expert testimony be elicited through hypothetical questions, rendering trial presentations “simpler, more direct, and less formulaic”
  • modern questioning of experts is “simpler, more direct, and less formulaic than in the past”
  • substance of expert’s answers provided jury with an explanation of the standard of care even though the technical legal standard was not stated verbatim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael A. Wolff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.