· 6/30/2008
Hickman v. Branson Ear, Nose & Throat, Inc.
Citations
- 256 S.W.3d 120
- 2008 Mo. LEXIS 61
- 2008 WL 2583001
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting salutary statutory, change eliminating requirement that expert testimony be elicited through hypothetical questions, rendering trial presentations “simpler, more direct, and less formulaic”
- modern questioning of experts is “simpler, more direct, and less formulaic than in the past”
- substance of expert’s answers provided jury with an explanation of the standard of care even though the technical legal standard was not stated verbatim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michael A. Wolff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.