Skip to main content
· 3/10/1925

Hickman Bank & Trust Co. v. Pickard

Citations

  • 207 Ky. 772
  • 270 S.W. 30
  • 1925 Ky. LEXIS 181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing how telemarketer’s de facto exclusive relationship with defendant may have rendered the telemarketer the defendant’s agent
  • “Settled law . . . permits a district court to consider hearsay at the preliminary injunction stage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sampson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.