Skip to main content
· 3/23/1964

Hickey v. Celebrezze

Citations

  • 229 F. Supp. 5
  • 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7020

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that proper response to a premature discovery request is to respond in the form of an objection or to move for a protective order
  • noting that an “attempt to contact [] counsel” or a single e-mail “is a far cry from conferring in good faith” as required by the Local Rules
  • noting that an “attempt to contact [] counsel” or a single e-mail “is a far cry from conferring in good faith” as required by the Local Rules
  • When served with a premature discovery request, defendant “failed to file any written response or motion for protective order, and he simply ignored Plaintiffs’ [discovery] request. This was improper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Daugherty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.