· 3/23/1964
Hickey v. Celebrezze
Citations
- 229 F. Supp. 5
- 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7020
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that proper response to a premature discovery request is to respond in the form of an objection or to move for a protective order
- noting that an “attempt to contact [] counsel” or a single e-mail “is a far cry from conferring in good faith” as required by the Local Rules
- noting that an “attempt to contact [] counsel” or a single e-mail “is a far cry from conferring in good faith” as required by the Local Rules
- When served with a premature discovery request, defendant “failed to file any written response or motion for protective order, and he simply ignored Plaintiffs’ [discovery] request. This was improper.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Daugherty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.