Hickerson v. Burner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating: “These irreconcilable conflicts the jury’s verdict has resolved in favor of the defendant, and its finding is, of course, binding on us.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thompson v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1952-04-21· cited 56×
• Crockett v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1948-04-26· cited 31×
• Levine v. McLeskey
  E.D. Virginia· 1995-03-10· cited 24×
• Kearns v. Hall
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1956-03-05· cited 23×
• Evans v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-11-26· cited 16×
• Eckel v. Breeze
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1960-05-11· cited 13×
• Hinton v. Gallagher
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1950-01-16· cited 11×
• McGuire v. Howard
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1962-12-03· cited 7×
• Ace Cab Co. v. Garcia
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-04-17· cited 3×
• Rushton v. Mountcastle
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1961-03-06· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Litz v. Harman
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1928-09-20· cited 28×