Skip to main content
· 9/29/1953

Hibben v. Kuchaj

Citations

  • 117 F. Supp. 55
  • 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • permitting late amendment where defendants did not respond to certain discovery requests until after the amendment deadline and the information needed to support amendment was contained in said responses
  • finding the plaintiff “satisfied the good cause standard of Rule 16(b
  • “This Court will not allow Defendants to benefit by their discovery violations by placing the onus on Plaintiff to seek amendment of her claims before Defendants have supplied their responses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.