Hi-Octane Terminal Co. v. Panama City

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• for Spanish-speaking father without an interpreter, services ordinarily considered to be reasonably available were “simply not ‘available’ in light of the language barrier”
• “[t]he well-established requirement, that the evidence be clear and convincing in order to prove termination under [section] 2511(a), exists to further protect against government interference with the family relation and the values it serves”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).