Skip to main content
· 9/21/2023

HHH Cattle, LLC and Waymon Hartwell A/K/A Scott Hartwell v. the Fundwork, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that South Dakota, as a seller of cement, was free to discriminate in a time of shortage by sell- ing cement only to in-state users
  • holding that a state-owned concrete plant could choose to sell only to state residents
  • holding that a State-operated cement plant was not subject to the Commerce Clause
  • holding that a State-operated cement plant was not subject to the Commerce Clause
  • emphasizing that a state conducting business as a private actor may “exercise [its] own independent discretion as to parties with whom [it] will deal,” and may preference in-state interests.
  • arguing that in light of State experimentation in policy “[a] healthy regard for federalism and good government renders us reluctant” to strike down a state program under the dormant Commerce Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.