H.H. Robertson, Company v. United Steel Deck, Inc. And Nicholas J. Bouras, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the preliminary injunction in the Third Circuit “is substantially the same standard enunciated by this court,” and that “[t]he standards applied to the grant of a preliminary injunction are no more nor less stringent in patent cases than in other areas of the law”
• sustaining district court’s conclusion that there was a “reasonable probability” that the movant would meet its burden
• requiring a patent holder seeking preliminary injunctive relief to overcome the defense that the patent is invalid even though the patent is presumed valid at trial
• granting preliminary injunction where patent did not have many years to run
• “The magnitude of the threatened injury to the patent owner is weighed, in the light of the strength of likelihood of success on the merits, against the injury to the accused infringer if the preliminary decision is in error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).