Skip to main content
· 10/4/2005

HGI Associates, Inc. v. Wetmore Printing Co.

Citations

  • 427 F.3d 867
  • 59 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1070
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 21427
  • 2005 WL 2428459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the amount of lost profit damages must be capable of being adequately determined by “some standard” but need not be proven with “mathematical precision”
  • recognizing Florida’s general rule to avoid lost profit damages as too speculative and conjectural
  • ignorance of true facts shown where alleged copyright infringer was \legitimately ignorant of the fact it might be infringing Microsoft's rights\
  • “Lost profits typically fall under the category of consequential damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Carnes, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.