Skip to main content
· 2/23/1934

Heywood Boot & Shoe Co. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 29 B.T.A. 1188
  • 1934 BTA LEXIS 1412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that in actual possession cases, it will rarely be necessary to go beyond the commonly used “readily accessible and easily available” instruction
  • \There was . . . ample evidence from which a trier of fact could find Easterlin was armed to protect the drugs.\
  • drug dealer was armed when he possessed drugs in his sock while a gun was sitting on his lap
  • “There was . . . ample evidence from which a trier of fact could find Easterlin was armed to protect the drugs.”
  • our Supreme Court has affirmed this concept

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seawell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.