Skip to main content
· 6/26/1953

Heyn v. Braun

Citations

  • 239 Minn. 496
  • 59 N.W.2d 326
  • 1953 Minn. LEXIS 654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding only a material breach of a contract will justify the non-breaching parties’ refusal to perform
  • allowing relation back of amendment setting forth new cause of action when amendment did not change or vary the facts alleged in the original complaint but merely amplified them
  • relation back allowed to add a claim for fair and reasonable value of improvements, where the original complaint was a mechanic’s lien for labor and material furnished in installation of an air conditioning unit
  • applying the relation back doctrine to a mechanic's lien action
  • applying the relation back doctrine to a mechanic’s lien action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.