Heyman v. Financial Properties Developers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the employee was terminated under a particular provision of an employment contract because that provision was “specifically invoked” in the termination letter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gaines v. Crompton & Knowles Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-03-10· cited 20×
• Mag Mutual Insurance v. Gatewood
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-02-15· cited 18×
• Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc. v. Heard
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-06-28· cited 12×
• Zhou v. LaGrange Academy, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-03-23· cited 11×
• Hopkins v. Hopkins
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-03-08· cited 6×
• Dominy v. National Emergency Services, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-10-27· cited 6×
• Travel Agency Group, Inc. v. Henderson Mill Travel, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-11-22· cited 4×
• Hubert v. Turner Outdoor Advertising, Ltd.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-04-22

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Early v. Kent
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1959-05-08· cited 37×
• Andrews v. Skinner
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-04-08· cited 37×
• Jones v. Barnes
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-04-12· cited 19×
• Foshee v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-03-06· cited 15×