Skip to main content
· 5/30/1985

Heyman v. Financial Properties Developers, Inc.

Citations

  • 332 S.E.2d 893
  • 175 Ga. App. 146
  • 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 2043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the employee was terminated under a particular provision of an employment contract because that provision was “specifically invoked” in the termination letter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley, Birdsong, Sognier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.