Heying v. Simonaitis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statements made by doctors regarding personality conflicts between the plaintiff nurse and her fellow employees did not impugn her ability as a nurse
• statements made by doctors regarding personality conflicts between the plaintiff nurse and her fellow employees did not impugn her ability as a nurse
• statements made by doctors regarding personality conflicts between the plaintiff nurse and her fellow employees did not impugn her ability as a nurse
• when read in context, doctors’ statements criticizing nurse for her personality conflicts with other hospital staff did not impugn her professional abilities as nurse or prejudice her in her profession and, thus, were not defamatory per se
• verbal abuse of colleagues not reflective of competence as nurse
• verbal abuse of colleagues not reflective of competence as nurse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).