Heyen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[w]e may review both oral and written statements in order to identify the findings of the trial court”
• finding the fact that the defendant “continue[d] to commit the same crimes again and again” reflected poorly on his character
• finding that if the evidence 7 yields logical and reasonable inferences from which the finder of fact may determine beyond a reasonable doubt that it was the defendant who was convicted of the prior felony, then a sufficient connection has been shown
• “Adequacy of control [over a drug purchase] goes to the weight and credibility of the evidence presented, which we will not reweigh.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bobby A. Harlan v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-07-19· cited 22×
• Schmidt v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2011-07-19· cited 2×
• Willie Bigsbee v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-10-02
• Kevin Lavell Curry v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-06-03
• Charles Anthony Hardy, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-10-12
• Xavier D. Jones v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-12-05
• Ivan Cornel Augustin Hendrickson, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-12-11