Hexter v. Crown Woolen Co.

Citations

• 95 Wash. 348

Syllabus

<p>Sales — Action tor Price — Contract—Evidence—Sueeiciency. A sale of goods upon the personal credit of the defendant, who was manager of a woolen company, although the goods were used in the business of the company, is conclusively shown, where it appears from letters and correspondence that he had made arrangements to take over the business of the company and asking a credit personal to himself to the extent of $3,000, that this was acted upon, the goods billed to him, and that statements were made to him of his indebtedness therefor.</p> <p>Actions — Misjoinder—Parties. The question of the misjoinder of actions must be judged by the allegations of the complaint and not by the results obtained at the trial, and the fact that other defendants were brought in and sought to be held on a theory that would make them jointly liable, and the trial court held to the contrary, does not constitute a misjoinder of causes of actions or the joinder of improper defendants.</p>