Hexcel Corp. v. Stepan Co. (In Re Hexcel Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a]ny future, unknown claim that could not have been reasonably contemplated does not fall within the purview of [§] 101(5
• “Cleaning up the environment to preserve the public’s health and safety should outweigh the economic interests of polluters who seek to avoid environmental cleanup liability in bankruptcy.”
• noting the absence of such a future-oriented mechanism in connection with CERCLA-related bankruptcy proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).