Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Berg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a district court has “the power to issue a stay” of confirmation of an arbitration award for “prudential reasons,” including “the pendency of a related proceeding”
• concluding that a district court may consider staying a case in broader circumstances than those found in Article VI of the Convention, but cautioning that the power to stay should be used judiciously
• concluding that a district court may consider staying a case in broader circumstances than those found in Article VI of the Convention, but cautioning that the power to stay should be used judiciously
• holding that “a district court may grant a stay in circumstances other than those authorized in Article VI” of the New York Convention, such as when there is a “related proceeding [pending] in another tribunal”
• noting that order confirming arbitration award was appealable in spite of not being final judgment because Congress directed that such orders be immediately appealable
• noting that insolvency of one party may play role in determining relative hardships

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Bull HN Information Systems, Inc. v. Hutson
  First Circuit· 2000-10-10· cited 126×
• Europcar Italia, S.P.A. v. Maiellano Tours, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1998-09-02· cited 120×
• Microfinancial, Inc. v. Premier Holidays International, Inc.
  First Circuit· 2004-10-05· cited 103×
• Four Seasons Hotels & Resorts, B v. v. Consorcio Barr S.A.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2004-07-20· cited 85×
• Ministry of Defense & Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Cubic Defense Systems, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-12-15· cited 85×
• Kaufman v. Shulman
  First Circuit· 2012-07-19· cited 35×
• Admart AG v. Stephen & Mary Birch Foundation, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 2006-08-08· cited 27×
• Lummus Global Amazonas, S.A. v. Aguaytia Energy Del Peru, S.R. Ltda.
  S.D. Texas· 2002-06-14· cited 26×
• G.E. Transport S.P.A. v. Republic of Albania
  District of Columbia· 2010-03-16· cited 26×
• O'Rourke v. Lunde and The Housing Group Limited Partnership
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2014-08-08· cited 15×
• In Re Arbitration Between Interdigital Communications Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2007-12-04· cited 14×
• Hardy Exploration & Prod. (India), Inc. v. Gov't of India
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-06-07· cited 13×
• Cappellini v. Mellon Mortgage Co.
  D. Massachusetts· 1998-01-15· cited 12×
• Jon Sanchez v. Robert Elizondo
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-01-05· cited 12×
• Wartsila Finland OY v. Duke Capital LLC
  Fifth Circuit· 2008-02-22· cited 8×
• Turner v. City of Boston
  D. Massachusetts· 2011-02-07· cited 6×
• Unnamed case
  Eleventh Circuit· 2004-07-20· cited 2×
• Gueyffier v. Ann Summers, Ltd.
  California Court of Appeal· 2006-10-26· cited 1×
• Russell G. Johnson Judith A. Johnson v. Lynn Hickey Dodge Inc., a Foreign Corporation
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-12-01
• Ge Transportation S.P.A. v. Republic of Albania, Ministry of Public Works, Transport, and Telecommunications
  District of Columbia· 2010-03-16

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Landis v. North American Co.
  Supreme Court· 1936-12-07· cited 5,442×
• Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in Action
  Supreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 369×
• Norton Ex Rel. Chiles v. Mathews
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-29· cited 304×
• Apollo Computer, Inc. v. Helge Berg
  First Circuit· 1989-10-25· cited 97×
• In Re Pioneer Ford Sales, Inc. Ford Motor Company
  First Circuit· 1984-03-06· cited 72×
• Acton Corporation v. Borden, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1982-02-12· cited 34×
• The Middleby Corporation v. Hussmann Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1992-04-29· cited 25×
• United States v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
  First Circuit· 1980-02-04· cited 15×
• Spier v. Calzaturificio Tecnica S.P.A.
  S.D. New York· 1987-06-29· cited 11×