Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Berg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a district court has “the power to issue a stay” of confirmation of an arbitration award for “prudential reasons,” including “the pendency of a related proceeding”
• concluding that a district court may consider staying a case in broader circumstances than those found in Article VI of the Convention, but cautioning that the power to stay should be used judiciously
• concluding that a district court may consider staying a case in broader circumstances than those found in Article VI of the Convention, but cautioning that the power to stay should be used judiciously
• holding that “a district court may grant a stay in circumstances other than those authorized in Article VI” of the New York Convention, such as when there is a “related proceeding [pending] in another tribunal”
• noting that order confirming arbitration award was appealable in spite of not being final judgment because Congress directed that such orders be immediately appealable
• noting that insolvency of one party may play role in determining relative hardships

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).