Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Barnes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that depositing income into an account unknown to the debtor’s creditors to pay for exempt property confirmed fraudulent intent
• holding that the plaintiff reasonably should have been knowledgeable about the danger of over inflating tires after two years on the job as an agricultural service tireman
• noting that “mere conversation is not be considered fraudulent unless other evidence proves actual intent to defraud creditors”
• finding that a debtor's whole pattern of conduct evinces his fraudulent intent
• debtor’s explanation that $19,586 was consumed by business and household expenses and gambling debts was unsatisfactory
• the corroboration must be sufficient to eliminate any speculation as to what happened to the assets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).