Hewing v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding because “findings of fact filed by the Board in regard to its disability determination do not permit us to intelligently review” the appellant’s assertions
• remanding because \findings of fact filed by the Board in regard to its disability determination do not permit us to intelligently review\ the appellant's assertions
• findings of workers' compensation board were not sufficient because board did not explicitly apply any of the factors required by AS 23.30.190 and .210; reviewing court could not determine if the board applied the proper factors and how it applied them
• scope of review not limited to substantial evidence test where Board’s decision rests on erroneous legal foundations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).