Hewett M. Reeves v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that five and a half year delay since initial judgment “is a factor to be considered in deciding whether to ... reform ... our mandate”
• although we modified our mandate, we refused to allow fees for seeking interest prohibited thereby in the district court and for subsequent appeal to this Court
• “However, once the total liability, including damages, is fixed by judgment, there is no reason to distinguish FLSA judgments from other claims. ‘Interest shall be allowed on any money judgment in a civil case recovered in a district court,’ commands 28 U.S.C. § 1961.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).